Super duplex grades are notably harder to machine than the austenitic stainless steel benchmark of 304L: the mixed ferrite-austenite microstructure produces high cutting forces, the work-hardening tendency is severe at low feed rates, and the chip is tough and stringy. The machinability rating relative to free-machining 12L14 (rated 100%) is approximately 25 to 30% for Ferralium 255, similar to standard duplex 2205 and slightly worse than 316L (which rates ~45%). The practical consequences are slower cutting speeds, heavier feed rates than would be tempting on austenitic, copious flood coolant or high-pressure through-tool coolant, sharp positive-rake tooling, and a rigid setup with no chatter.
- Never dwell: stopping the cut on the workpiece work-hardens the surface, jamming the next pass and breaking the tool
- Heavy feed beats light feed: a heavier feed pushes the cut below the work-hardened layer; light feeds skate on the hardened skin
- Sharp tools, replace early: a worn insert produces excess cutting force, accelerates work-hardening, then breaks; replace at first sign of flank wear
- Coolant continuously: flood-cool or through-spindle high-pressure (≥ 70 bar). Air alone is inadequate; super duplex retains heat in the cut zone
- Rigid setup, no chatter: short tool overhang, full chuck engagement, balanced workholding. Chatter destroys insert edges fast in super duplex
- Climb mill (down-cut): conventional milling work-hardens the surface ahead of the next tooth; climb milling shears under the hardened layer
- Passivation (ASTM A967)
- Pickling (ASTM A380)
- Electropolishing
- Mill / 2B / 2D / BA finish
- Bright bar / centreless ground
- Peeled & polished bar
- Shot-blast (EN 10088-2)